This is my personal arrangement to provide a useful format for discussing and disseminating breaking news and information.
Opinions posted here are not necessarily my own. If you are offended by wide open discussions of news, life, politics and religious things, and God's word, kindly get out of here NOW.
At times sources quoted here are suspect at best. I try to make sure they are correct, but I do err at times. Comments by readers are theirs alone, I may or may not approve of their opinions.
Friday, October 16, 2015
A case of a killer cop in Michigan being reconsidered -- finally
DEAD for flashing his HIGH BEAMS is Deven Guilford, 17 years old
Shot and killed by Sgt. Jonathan Frost, Eaton County Sheriff's Dept.
CNN is now covering this as the case resurfaces:
Have you ever seen or heard such in America as we have been seeing more and more police assaults on We the People which have led to shootings and death? And it just continues to occur more and more.
Finally here's a case in Michigan that is perhaps being reconsidered. If you haven't seen this one take a look at these reports and LINKS:
Various comments surrounding this event are chilling to say the least. Are We the People safe at traffic stops anymore?
This is another very disgusting story of a SHERIFF DEPUTY:
Are police creating unnecessary and unwanted conflict?
This cop had a new vehicle (paid for by We the People) with bright lights and had an attitude toward other drivers who noticed his brighter lights thinking he had his HIGH BEAMS on. I would never expect such behavior by police but it may be becoming more commonplace these days:
The officer admitted that he had been bright-ed by multiple vehicles -
that was an indication that the 17-year-old was in fact correct is
saying the lights are overly bright. The officer was the one that yanked
him out of the car, ordered him to the ground, attempted to taser him
and eventually shot him. The idea that the single action by the teen
somehow became the only act of aggression in a series of acts of
aggressions, is at best laughable.
What seems to be getting
overlooked is that both the officer and the teen came into that
encounter with the right to self-defense and the officer was the only
one that utilized a force multiplier, in the taser and then ultimately
in the firearm. The officer created the circumstances that allowed him
to use deadly force, since he was the paid professional, it is his job
to try to deescalate the situation. Instead of simply doing what he said
that he was going to do - explaining that his lights were new ... he
chose to use the threat of tasering and arrest as a means of proving a
point.