Wednesday, March 24, 2021

Mr. Rodney Jones 'Defending the Faith' knows nothing...he is deceived by his father the Devil and Satan!

Enjoy your pals Reflect on God's Word:

So Defending the faith is defending the scriptures of Satan:  And his own pal from the UK he's now taking issue with about the KJV vs. THE PERVERSIONS. 

If you GOT QUESTIONS just ask Rodney Jones and he can look up the answers for you at GOT QUESTIONS:



Defending the faith.
Question: "Why are the newer translations of the Bible missing verses?" Answer: If you compare the King James and New King James Versions with the newer translations (e.g., the New International Version, English Standard Version, Christian Standard Bible, New Living Translation, etc.), you will notice that several verses are entirely missing from the newer translations. Examples of missing verses and passages are John 5:4, Acts 8:37, and 1 John 5:7. Another example is Mark 16:9–20, although that passage is always placed in the text or in footnotes. In addition to the few missing verses, there are numerous words and phrases that are missing from newer translations. Why do these translations omit these verses, phrases, and words? Are the newer translations taking verses out of the Bible, as some claim? No, the newer translations are not removing verses from the Bible. Rather, the newer translations are attempting to accurately present what the biblical writers originally wrote, and that means leaving out anything that was not part of the original text. Any content “missing” in newer translations is believed by most scholars to not have been in the Bible to begin with. The KJV was translated in AD 1611; the New Testament translators of the KJV used a Greek manuscript called the Textus Receptus. Since that time, many biblical manuscripts have been discovered that predate the Textus Receptus, and these older manuscripts, in theory, are likely to be more accurate. In their research, Bible scholars and textual critics have discovered some differences between the Textus Receptus and the older manuscripts. It seems that, over the course of 1,500 years, some words, phrases, and even sentences were added to the Bible, either intentionally or accidentally. The “missing verses” mentioned above are simply not found in some of the oldest and most reliable manuscripts. So, the newer translations remove these verses or place them in footnotes or in brackets because the translators believe they do not truly belong in the Bible. For example, John 5:4 is included in the KJV, but in the NKJV the verse has a footnote attached explaining that it is not found in many Greek texts; the NASB includes the verse in brackets; the NIV places the verse in a footnote, so John 5:4 is “missing” in the actual text. The disputed portion is this: “waiting for the moving of the waters; for an angel of the Lord went down at certain seasons into the pool and stirred up the water; whoever then first, after the stirring up of the water, stepped in was made well from whatever disease with which he was afflicted” (John 5:3–4, NASB). Here is a possible explanation of how John 5:4 ended up in the Bible: a scribe is writing out John 5, in which Jesus visits the pool of Bethesda: “Here a great number of disabled people used to lie—the blind, the lame, the paralyzed. One who was there had been an invalid for thirty-eight years” (John 5:3–5). But then the scribe gets to verse 7, as Jesus speaks to the man about his desire to be healed, and the man says, “I have no one to help me into the pool when the water is stirred” (verse 7). The scribe considers the man’s reference to “stirred” water as a source of possible confusion, as John does not expound on it. So the scribe writes a quick note in the margin to explain why the invalid was waiting for “stirred” water—an angel came down at certain times to make something special happen. The scribe’s notation was an attempt to aid the reader in understanding Scripture. But then, as more and more copies of that manuscript were made, the scribe’s marginal note was transferred from the margin and inserted into the actual text as part of the passage. It may be that the later copyist misconstrued the intention of the marginal note: instead of being a commentary of sorts, the note was seen as the scribe’s attempt to correct a mistake, inserting a verse he had accidentally left out. Thus, what the scribe meant as a helpful gloss resulted in John 5 expanding by one verse. It is important to remember that the verses in question are of minor significance. None of them change in any way the crucial themes of the Bible, nor do they have any impact on the Bible’s doctrines—Jesus’ death and resurrection; Christ’s being the only way of salvation; and the doctrines of heaven and hell, sin and redemption, and the nature and character of God. These doctrines are preserved intact through the work of the Holy Spirit, who safeguards the Word of God for all generations. It is not a matter of the newer translations missing verses, and it is not a matter of the KJV translators adding to the Bible. It is a matter of determining, through careful research and textual science, what content was most likely part of the original manuscripts of the Bible.
Show less
Hide 12 replies
Reflect On Gods word
The nestles allund from the Vatican led you to believe the KJV added, when in fact the niv took away. Sir, this video is done out of love, because Satan don't want you to know the full truth. Having a Bible with missing verses and then they have the audacity to call niv a copyright novel a Holy Bible is outrageous. The footnotes have lied to people saying in the original Greek etc.... And they know its there, they have deceived billions of innocent Christians thinking the niv is a good Bible. Missing verses from niv esv is a MAJOR red 🚩. Plus they keep updating them every other year. Bible gateway the KJV is Public domain. Niv esv is Copyright © its all about money. If they didn't say it right yesterday, they'd get it right tomorrow. Having a Bible that for instance misses verse 11 from Matthew 18 is not given by God. God did not give out Bibles with missing verses. The last time I checked, my God could count! YOU Rodney need to seriously wake up to this truth! Niv is only giving you half the story.... The KJV aligns with Tyndale Bible, Geneva, Bishops and the Holy Bible. Nestles Allund Page 45 - "ALL new versions are made under the supervision of the Vatican." The Vatican have catholics working in the niv board. The KJV has had 54 men who were of God and believed what was written. From Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic straight from Antioch - Acts 11:26 FIRST CHRISTIANS at Antioch. I am trying to show people the truth. For peats sake niv removed BLOOD from Colossians 1:14!!! The same message is in Ephesians 1:7 but Paul preached the same message at Collose. The BLOOD is what we are redeemed by brother...... Westcott & Hort were behind the counterfeit bibles and the Vatican knows this... I'm praying for your eyes to be opened in Jesus name.
Reflect On Gods word
 @Porter Maxwell  Amen.
Defending the faith.
Reflect Upon The Word whatever. This just divides the church. People need to read the Bible. And seek God in their reading. All versions are translated. When are you going NV to start teaching on your channel? Not just showing scripture or reading it. Eyes opened? So you say my teaching is wrong? I teach in my channel. I stud y and compare many translations. I have not many who only read the kjv to actually know the word. A few I have. Not many.
Reflect On Gods word
 @Defending the faith.  Sorry if you think this divides, but God commands us to be of one mind - 1 Corinthians 1:10 Niv says so many wrong things. Please, have a look at the video link in my description box. Will explain more. I want people to know truth! Sorry, but that's it. God Bless you in Jesus name.
Defending the faith.
Reflect Upon The Word it divides if we argue on subjects Like this. The niv is on e of the closest translations to the original text. I have been going over this for many years. Talking with many about it. But I always come to seeking God in all we do. Especially on his word. I know how God reveals it to me. No man will convince me otherwise. I ha e many older folks that say the NIV is printed by the same company that prints the so called gay Bible. And many other things that are not true. I read the esv and the NLT along with the kjv and NIV. Seek God. Not man.
Defending the faith.
Reflect Upon The Word I have watch the link. Are you saying my channel teaching is wrong? Answer that question for me. I want people to know the truth.
Reflect On Gods word
 @Defending the faith.  Brother, if the truth is offensive here to you, then maybe this channel you don't have to watch. The niv is a perversion, and any perversion that removes Gods word, is not worthy if being called a Holy Bible. You will not get me to accept the niv being the closest we have today. Will you please watch the video in my description box. I'm not arguing with you. I just believe you need to wake up from Satan's corrupted versions. Please watch the link. I'm holding on to the Bible that has not been updated since 408 years, only thing that changed later was spelling, and words updated, but nothing removed or no doctrine removed. Niv changes so much and is contradictory in many places. As I said, if this truth offends, then instead of arguing, your not obliged to watch. I want my brethren to know the truth and by Gods grace I'll tell it.... God Bless you.
Defending the faith.
Reflect Upon The Word I am not trying to make you convert to the NIV. I am not going to not speak up when you are trying to tell others it is not corrupt. You have not answered my question. Maybe you have never really watched what I teach. I teach truth. And the scripture i use I helps me do that. I am not about works. I am about people finding who God is. Sometimes people read us. If we keep going against each other. It doesn’t help. Let people seek God in what ever they read.
Defending the faith.
Reflect Upon The Word I love you brother. I won’t say anymore on this topic with you. I am not leaving your channel. You are family.
Reflect On Gods word
 @PureFire of God - Mum and Son In Christ  God is a God of division. He's also a God of truth. John 16:13 KJV. The Holy Spirit will guide us into all truth. Yes, Harper Collins published niv and the satanic Bible for money 💷. I'm not going to be typing all night... I've uploaded this video because I care about truth and I care my brethren are being deceived. Sorry folks, but that's the way it is in Jesus name. Peace in Jesus name.
Reflect On Gods word
https://youtu.be/XrxdePuAAko This video shows niv calls Jesus CAPSTONE. The pyramid with the eye of Lucifier is capstone... Jesus is Cornerstone. If this is considered causing division, then I'll take my leave, I'll leave YouTube a good month and pray for my brothers and sisters in Christ who deserve the truth... See ya later in Jesus name.
Reflect On Gods word
 @Porter Maxwell  Amen!

 

Posted by The News UNIT at 11:26 PM